Hot Keywords
Batteries Solar cell Fuel cell Supercapacitors Lithium batteries Lithium-ion batteries Electrode Water splitting Catalysis

Energy Mater 2022;2:200041. 10.20517/energymater.2022.76 © The Author(s) 2022.
Open Access Mini Review

Advances in lithium-ion battery materials for ceramic fuel cells

1School of Microelectronics, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, Hubei, China.

2Functional Materials Laboratory, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, Shaanxi, China.

3Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA.

#Authors contributed equally.

*Correspondence to: Wei Zhang, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Dr., Houghton, MI 49931, USA. E-mail: ; Prof./Dr. Sining Yun, Functional Materials Laboratory, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, No. 13, Yanta Road, Yanta District, Xi’an 710055, Shaanxi, China. E-mail: ; Prof./Dr. Baoyuan Wang, School of Microelectronics, Hubei University, No. 368, Friendship Avenue, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430062, Hubei, China. E-mail:

    Views:481 | Downloads:43 | Cited:0 | Comments:0 | :18
    Academic Editor: Yuping Wu | Copy Editor: Fangling Lan | Production Editor: Fangling Lan

    © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.


    Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and ceramic fuel cells (CFCs) are important for energy storage and conversion technologies and their materials are central to developing advanced applications. Although there are many crosslinking research activities, e.g., through materials and some common scientific fundamentals employed for both LIB and CFCs, crosslinking scientific aspects to achieve a comprehensive understanding are missing. There is a lack of such a review to promote and guide further research and development in the crosslinking of LIBs and CFCs. Herein, we review the existing application of LIB materials in CFCs to discover the scientific advances of lithium-ion and proton transport cooperation and identify the new directions of Li-CFCs in the future. This review is the first to propose CFC advances, especially at low temperatures (300-600 °C) by applying LIB materials to practical devices and highlight the material properties and new device functions with enhanced performance, as well as the scientific mechanisms and principles. Furthermore, we seek to deepen the scientific understanding of materials science, ion transport mechanisms and semiconductor electrochemistry to benefit both the battery and fuel cell fields.


    Fossil energy must be replaced by clean and sustainable energy. Due to the large storage capacity of water, hydrogen energy obtained by the electrolysis of water is likely to play an important role in future energy sources, especially from seawater[1]. Ceramic fuel cells (CFCs), including solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), proton ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs), ceria-carbonate composite fuel cells and semiconductor membrane fuel cells[2], have attracted significant attention due to their highly efficient utilization of H2 fuel, which can convert chemical to electrical energy directly with high efficiency[3]. As shown in Figure 1A, a CFC can be divided into three parts, namely, an anode, cathode and electrolyte. Generally, the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at the cathode and the hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) at the anode require efficient and stable electrocatalytic materials to facilitate the electrode reactions. The electrolyte not only avoids the direct thermal combustion between hydrogen and oxygen but also transports the ions (O2- and H+) while blocking redundant electron leakage from the HOR. Obviously, the excess electricity generated by fuel combustion can be stored for continuous use by energy storage devices.

    Figure 1. Schematic illustrations of a (A) CFC and (B) LIB. CFC: Ceramic fuel cell; LIB: lithium-ion battery.

    Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have occupied an indispensable position in energy storage devices. Due to their advantages of portability, environmental friendliness, small size and lightweight, LIBs are widely used in electric vehicles and mobile electronic devices[4]. As shown in Figure 1B, the physical structure of a LIB is similar to that of a CFC, with a cathode, anode and electrolyte; however, the three components play different roles in LIBs. Lithium ions are released from the cathode and intercalated in the anode during charging and this process is reversed when discharging. The electrolyte provides a place for lithium ions to shuttle between the cathode and anode[5]. As an efficient energy conversion device, however, the practical application of CFCs has been restricted by their severe operating requirements (e.g., high operating temperature) compared with the room-temperature operation of LIBs.

    As the state-of-the-art commercial electrolyte material in CFCs, 8 mol.% yttrium stabilized zirconia (YSZ) exhibits an appreciable conductivity (0.1 S/cm) but only at a high temperature of ~1000 °C[6]. High temperatures result in significant challenges to devices, such as reduced stability, limitations regarding application sites and high manufacturing costs, which restrict commercial development. Based on the current state of development, exploring low-temperature (300-600 °C) CFCs is more meaningful and challenging[7]. Sebastian et al. reported that reversible ion exchange occurred when replacing Li+ with H+ in a LIB material, which implies that a LIB material can turn into a proton conductor[8]. All-solid-state LIBs with high lithium-ion conductivity will drive the development of low-temperature CFCs based on proton conductors. Wei et al. found that Sr-doped Li13.9Sr0.1Zn(GeO4)4 exhibited high conductivity for lithium ions and protons under fuel cell operating conditions[9]. The pathway for H+ is from one site to another in the three-dimensional Li+ transport network. The Li+ and H+ interacting transport mechanism has been deeply studied, including exchange, coupling and so on, which provides a strong basis for the application of LIB materials in fuel cells and drives the development of fuel cell devices to low temperatures.

    In addition to electrolytes, LIB materials have also been successfully used as fuel cell electrodes. A typical example is Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05Li-oxide (NCAL), which possesses excellent electrocatalytic properties as an electrode material for CFCs and shows significant potential for replacing traditional noble metal- and multi-element-doped oxide-based electrodes[10]. Despite some differences in the ionic species in the electrolyte, there is a high similarity between the operating principles of LIBs and CFCs, namely, both of them are electrochemical devices based on redox reactions at the anode and cathode to convert chemical energy to electricity. It is noteworthy that in recent research and developments for both LIBs and CFCs, semiconducting properties[11], electronic states[12], band structure and built-in electric field (BIEF) effects[13] have been introduced into electrochemical devices to improve and enhance the ion transfer in electrode dynamics for enhanced high rate cycling and device durability[14]. These factors also help to improve the energy storage capacity and performance of devices[15]. In addition, there is an important common principle for the space-charge layer (SCL) effect on interfacial ion transport in all-solid-state batteries and CFCs[16]. Thus, significant efforts have been stimulated to investigate the crosslinking transport mechanism between lithium-ion and proton/oxygen ion transport in novel CFCs. LIB materials also exhibited excellent catalytic properties for hydrogen oxidation and oxygen reduction in CFCs[17], which can effectively reduce the operating temperature of CFCs by using low-temperature electrolyte materials for practical applications[18]. LIB materials used in CFCs provide an attractive research direction for the future development of CFCs[19,20].


    Based on the state-of-the-art applications of LIB materials in CFCs and their crosslinking methodologies, as well as common material properties and scientific principles, we can make the following perspectives to facilitate further research and development to crosslink these two important fields.

    Semiconducting properties of materials

    The semiconducting properties of materials are the basic scientific principles for supporting the high-performance output of CFCs. Related applications have also attracted significant attention in the fields of LIBs, Na-ion batteries and Zn-ion batteries. From the work of Ensling et al., the Li+ deintercalation of LixCO2 thin-film cathode materials led to the evolution of the electronic structure, as shown in Figure 2A[11]. From the Li+ removal, Co3+ was oxidized to Co4+ and the electronic state at the oxygen site was stable. Furthermore, the Fermi level was lowered and the electronic density of states deviated. The top of the O2p band overlapped with the Co3d state, with the hole transferred to the O2p states. The density of states (DOS) showed that the deep Li deintercalation had an important impact on the band structure of Li1-xCoO2[11]. For the CFC cathode material Sb-doped Ba0.5Sr0.5FeO3-δ perovskite oxide, Sb doping could enhance the electrical conductivity and ORR activity. The DOS of the p and d band centers shifts near the Fermi level with Sb doping, as shown in Figure 2B, which can increase the efficiency of electron transfer to the adsorbed oxygen species O2. The higher DOS induced by Sb provided faster kinetics of charge transfer[21]. Exploring the semiconducting properties of materials inspires us to define electrical energy devices from another perspective. The introduction of external ions into the lattice changes the DOS of the substrate material, resulting in variations in the semiconducting properties of the materials. It is necessary to consider the semiconducting properties of the materials as they can directly affect the output properties of the device.

    Figure 2. (A) Electronic band structure of LiCoO2 cathode in a LIB (Li = 1, left), Li0.5CoO2 (Li = 0.5, middle) and CoO2 (Li = 0, right). Copyright from Ref.[11]. (B) Optimized structure and electron PDOS calculated by density functional theory for Ba0.5Sr0.5Fe1-xSbxO3-δ(x = 0, left; x = 0.05, middle; x = 0.1, right) Copyright from Ref.[21].

    Electrochemical principles of semiconductors in LIBs and CFCs

    In LIBs and CFCs, charged ions pass from the cathode, anode, dissociate through the electrolyte and bring energy conversion according to electrochemical methods. The semiconducting properties and energy band theory can improve electrochemical kinetics and increase the transport rate. Crosslinking methods promote the scientific understanding of electrochemical devices. Generally, the energy band is closely associated with the charge transfer. The opposite charges were left at the interface between the electrode and electrolyte, leading to the generation of a Helmholtz double layer on the electrolyte side[22]. The free e- in the conduction band and h+ from the valence band of the electrode exchange their charges in the diffusion processes with the electrolyte, resulting in charge accumulation at the surface[23] and band bending formed at the interface (as shown in Figure 3A) with the Fermi level, thereby achieving an equilibrium position. In CFCs, n- and p-type semiconductors can maintain the BIEF to block electron penetration and enhance the ion transport, with a one-interface device being used instead of two interfaces (anode/electrolyte and cathode/electrolyte), as shown in Figure 3B. In a LIB system, the DOS of the LiCoO2 positive electrode are related to the Fermi level of the Co4+/3+ redox couple, as demonstrated in Figure 3C, pertaining to the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the liquid electrolyte. To keep a LIB working properly, the chemical potential of the electrode must be controlled in the energy gap between the HOMO and LUMO. From the electrolyte interface of the double-layer LiCoO2/diethyl carbonate (DEC) (alkyl carbonate solvent) electrolyte reported by Becker et al., the Li ion energy level bent in the opposite direction to the energy level of the electrons[24]. The diffusion of Li ions through the charge layer at interfaces caused the band bending, as illustrated by Figure 3D, and the changing of the charge carrier concentration had a non-negligible impact on the charge transfer rate.

    Figure 3. An overview of LIB and CFC band structures from semiconductor electrochemical aspects. (A) Schematic of working principle and energy diagram at LIB/CFC electrode (semiconductor) interface with the electrolyte, in which the Fermi levels are in equilibrium positions. Copyright from Ref.[22]. (B) Schematic of working principle and energy diagram for a CFC without an electrolyte, Copyright from Ref.[22]. (C) Relative energy positions of LiCoO2 cathode with respect to HOMO and LUMO of liquid electrolyte in a LIB. Copyright from Ref.[11]. (D) Energy level diagram of LiCoO2/DEC interface established from low-temperature adsorption of DEC (alkyl carbonate solvent) electrolyte. Copyright from Ref.[24]. (E) Band bending and alignment occurring in CeO2 electrolyte CFC, resulting in a double-layer device due to P/N junction formed under H2/air fuel cell conditions. Copyright from Ref.[25]. (F) Band bending and alignment situation and device working principle for semiconductor cubic silicon carbide (3C-SiC)/ZnO electrolyte in a CFC. Copyright from Ref.[26].

    The double-layer electrolyte model for CFCs is also suitable. In a report by Wang et al., CeO2 on the air side showed hole (p-type) conduction and reduced CeO2 (R-CeO2) on the H2 side turned to electron (n-type) conduction[25]. The band energy alignment between p-type CeO2 and n-type R-CeO2 facilitated the charge separation and blocked the excess electrons, as shown in Figure 3E. The oxygen vacancy as a two-electron donor center converted Ce4+ to Ce3+. Based on the generation process of Ce3+ and oxygen vacancies at the interface, a double-layer cell structure was formed due to the p-n junction, while the surface and grain boundaries can promote ion transport. From the work of Xing et al., the N-N 3C-SiC/ZnO heterostructure electrolyte in a CFC exhibited an improved ionic conductivity of 0.12 S/cm through the energy band alignment methodology in Figure 3F[26]. The enrichment of charged ions at the interface has a positive effect on ion transport. Band bending due to ion aggregation is a guarantee for continuous movement. This methodology plays an important role in electrochemical devices.

    Impact of BIEF on electrochemical performance of LIBs and CFCs

    The common characteristic of the semiconductor and energy band theories in LIBs and CFCs is that the band alignment induces a BIEF, which has an enhancement effect on the electrochemical performance, especially regarding the promotion of ion transport[27]. The BIEF can also improve the cycle life and fast discharge-charge cycling and enlarge the capacity in LIBs. A BIEF at the semiconductor particle level has been reported by Xia et al. for a TiO2-based electrode, as shown in Figure 4A, which accelerated electrode Li intercalation at high charge-discharge rates and promoted the Li-ion diffusion process[13]. Another Li-ion migration mechanism is also important, namely, the SCL, which is widely discussed for solid-state lithium batteries. The concept is that a SCL is formed by continuous charge distributed in a space but not a point of charge. The electron cloud of charge and carriers fully diffuses in the solid area to form the space charge region, similar to the p-n junction in semiconductors. First-principles calculations [Figure 4B] showed that Li-ion migration across the interface between the cathode and electrolyte depended on the higher lithium chemical potential site and potential energy surfaces, which can cause dynamic Li+ depletion with interfacial electron transfer[28]. In-situ differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy and finite element simulations were used to identify a BIEF, indicating a reduced SCL and boosted Li+ transmission, in all-solid-state LIBs[29]. The migration mechanism of Li ions is favorable for observing the movement process of protons, electrons and oxygen ions, and finding the key factors for the working process of LIB materials in fuel cells.

    Figure 4. Overview of BIEF-enhanced ion transmission in LIBs, Na-ion batteries and CFCs. (A) Illustration of facilitation of Li+ charge transport under a BIEF during discharge (left) and charge (right). Copyright from Ref.[13]. (B) Li-ion transport mechanism at heterogeneous LiCoO2 cathode/β-Li3PS4 solid electrolyte interface in a LIB. Copyright from Ref.[28]. (C) Schematic of BIEF formation and Na+ storage mechanism upon discharge (left) and charge (right) of a Na-ion battery of Fe2O3/Na0.67(Mn0.67Ni0.23Mg0.1)O2. Further comparison of BIEF-induced high-performance CFCs. Copyright from Ref.[30]. (D) Band diagrams and alignment at Sm2O3/SmNi interface determined from UPS and UV-vis spectroscopy and schematic of proton transport process in SmNi. Copyright from Ref.[31]. (E) BIEF-confined proton transport in CeO2/CeO2-δ core-shell structure and illustration of a proton conduction shuttle mechanism. Copyright from Ref.[32].

    Similarly, the construction of a BIEF has also been demonstrated to be very effective in developing high-performance Na-ion batteries, as reported by Ni et al.[30]. Figure 4C illustrates a BIEF spontaneously formed at the heterogeneous interface of n-Fe2O3 and p-FeS2. During discharge (sodiation), the Na+ was driven by the BIEF from n-type Fe2O3 to p-type FeS2, resulting in an enhancement in transport kinetics. For recharging, the opposite process of Na+ desodiation made a new BIEF directing from FeS2 to Fe2O3. Consequently, the BIEF consistently enhances the Na+ diffusion kinetics in the S-Fe2O3 system. Our current understanding of the transport mechanisms from BIEFs provides a new direction for CFC research. The BIEF mechanism has been widely applied to develop advanced CFCs. A Sm2O3/Ni-Sm2O3 core shell homostructure was proposed to accelerate proton transport, as shown in Figure 4D. With Ni surface modification, the increased oxygen vacancies provided transport channels for protons and the local electric field of the Sm2O3/Ni-Sm2O3 homostructure confined the proton migration only in the highly conductive surface layer[31]. Xing et al. reported that proton conduction was enhanced because of the BIEF in a CeO2/CeO2-δ core-shell structure, as illustrated by Figure 4E[32]. The electronic state changed due to the concentration of oxygen vacancies increasing in CeO2-δ. The charge separation at the surface of CeO2-δ/CeO2 limited proton transmission through the near-surface layer of the particle. Although BIEFs are generally instructive for electrochemical devices, the relevant applications of BIEFs in LIBs have implications for CFCs.

    Promoting performance by LIB and CFC crosslinking

    Although the working mechanisms in electrochemical devices are different, the promotion of ion diffusion by different methodologies has a strong correlation. Li+ conduction highly relies on lithium vacancies in solid oxides and a well-designed Li+ concentration and an optimized occupancy rate can enhance the ionic conductivity[33]. Thus, clarifying the transport mechanism of Li+ is necessary to improve the conductivity. For LiFePO4 with an olivine-type structure[34], the calculation results in Figure 5A show that Li ions migrating along the [010] direction have a lower activation energy (0.27 eV) and a continuous curved pathway rather than linear hopping. Two PO4 tetrahedral shared faces with octahedra to coordinate interstitial sites mean that the cation rarely occupies the site in the [001] direction[35]. Moreover, LiFePO4 is also regarded as a small polaron material and the mixed valent state was obtained by partial oxidation. The charge carriers might be holes in Li1-yFePO4 and electrons in the case of LixFePO4. By calculating the long-range electrostatic interactions and observing the high-temperature solid solution state of detached LiFePO4, it is found that Li ions and electrons are highly coupled during the transport process. The activation energies of a hole polaron and a lithium vacancy ( 0.5 eV) were larger than a single Li ion and an electron (0.37 eV). The lithium disorder occurred at 220 °C, which was the same temperature at which rapid electron hopping commenced[36].

    Figure 5. (A) Li-ion transport along the b-axis in LiFePO4, where the curved trajectories are shown as red arrows, the iron octahedra are orange, the phosphate tetrahedra are blue and lithium ions are green. Copyright from Ref.[34]. (B) Schematic of SNO electrolyte working principle in a CFC (left) and the electronic structure of the Ni 3d orbitals of SNO (right). Copyright from Ref.[37]. (C) Hydrogen and lithium dopants for migration pathway (left) along [001] direction in SmNiO3 and its activation energy (right). Copyright from Ref.[38].

    For SmNiO3, chemical doping can lead to a metal-to-insulator transition under isothermal conditions. As Figure 5B shows, in the operating range (300-500 °C), the metallic conductivity of SNO was detrimental to the electrolyte[37]. Because of the single electron occupancy on the fourfold degenerate manifold on Ni3+, the carriers can move freely without overcoming the on-site Coulombic repulsion. When electrons migrate to the H-SNO parts, the e- reduced nickel to Ni2+ while being suppressed by the Hubbard intra-orbital electron-electron Coulombic interaction (U). The filling-controlled Mott transitions of H-SNO mean that it can be used as an electrolyte in CFCs due to the wide electronic band gap. The concentration of protons in SNO was not limited by that of oxygen vacancies, in contrast to typical proton conductors (e.g., yttrium-doped BaCeO3 or BaZrO3). With H and Li doping in SmNiO3, density functional theory calculations verified that H or Li migrated along the [001] direction with a migration barrier of ~0.3 eV for hydrogen and ~0.4 eV for lithium[38], as shown in Figure 5C. In lithiated SmNiO3 (Li-SNO), mobile Li ions are located at the interstitial sites of the perovskite, which migrate from the bottom Ni layer to the next Ni layer, resulting in lattice expansion that enhances Li+ conduction with a low activation energy. For hydrogenated SmNiO3(H-SNO), high proton conductivity was achieved by converting metallic conducting SNO to the electronically insulating phase[37]. The Pmax of a fuel cell with Pt electrodes obtained 225 mW/cm2 with an OCV of 1.03 V at 500 °C. The results of these investigations indicate that the charge transmission pathway has a strong correlation between LIBs and CFCs.


    LIB materials for single-layer fuel cells

    The use of LIB materials in single-layer fuel cells (SLFCs) is an important research area. The first SLFC was reported in 2011 by Zhu et al.[39]. It was fabricated from one homogeneous layer composited by semiconductors and ionic conductors, as shown in Figure 6A. SLFCs can provide electrochemical performance comparable to that of complex three-layer fuel cells and their simple material preparation and fabrication procedure provide technical advantages. The physical junction always has a crucial effect in overcoming the internal short circuit issue in SLFCs[40]. The continuous evolution of LIB materials has resulted in better electronic and Li-ion conductivity while improving the specific capacity, energy density and structural stability. These excellent characteristics provide a reliable basis for the selection of fuel cell materials. In addition to the LiNiZn oxide (LNZ)-(Samarium-doped ceria) SDC composites discussed above, LiNiCuZnFeOx-NSDC single components also exhibit impressive cell performance (e.g., 700 mW/cm2 at 550 °C)[41]. The combination of Gadolinium-doped ceria-KAlZn oxide (GDC-KAZ) and LNCZ created an excellent ion transport membrane for single-component fuel cells (SCFCs), which obtained an excellent electrochemical performance of 628 mW/cm2 at 580 °C, as well as a high ionic conductivity of 0.08 S/cm at 600 °C[42]. Similarly, a MZSDC-LNCS (Mg0.4Zn0.6O/Ce0.8Sm0.2O2-δ-Li0.3Ni0.6Cu0.07Sr0.03O2-δ) SLFC illustrated a high electrochemical power output of 600 mW/cm2 at 630 °C[43]. A SLFC with a Li0.4Mg0.3Zn0.3O/Ce0.8Sm0.2O2-δ (LMZSDC) composite demonstrated robust durability for over 120 h at 600 °C. AC impedance revealed that LMZSDC had a high ionic conductivity (0.1 S/cm at 600 °C), which contributed to its successful application to SLFCs[44].

    Figure 6. LIB materials for (A) SLFCs and as (B) electrodes and (C) electrolytes for CFCs. SLFCs: Single-layer fuel cells; CFCs: ceramic fuel cells.

    Layer-structured LiNi0.1Fe0.90O2-δ (LNF) has a good proton conductivity of 0.01-0.1 S/cm at 500-600 °C with competitive electrocatalytic activities. A LNF-composited SDC SLFC showed a power output of 760 mW/cm2 at 550 °C, where excellent performance was achieved by a simple device structure[45]. Hu et al. attempted the application of LiNiO-based materials modified with different transition metal elements in SLFCs. Li0.3Ni0.6Cu0.07Sr0.03O2-δ (LNCuS), Li0.3Ni0.6Mn0.07Sr0.03O2-δ (LNMnS) and Li0.3Ni0.6Co0.07Sr0.03O2-δ (LNCoS) were mixed with the ionic conductor SDC, respectively[46]. The electrical conductivity of these single-component membranes calculated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy followed the sequence of 6SDC-4LNMnS > 6SDC-4LNCoS > 6SDC-4LNCuS. The single cell based on the optimized 6SDC-4LNMnS membrane showed the highest power density of 422 mW/cm2 at 550 °C[46]. In summary, the as-used LIB materials showed three-in-one functions (anode, cathode and electrolyte) in the single-layer devices. The excellent electrical properties of LIB materials represent a new development direction for next-generation fuel cells, which eliminate the traditional three-layer structure with higher electrochemical performance in the low-temperature range.

    LIB materials for CFC electrodes

    With the excellent performance of LIB materials, their ion-conducting properties and catalytic effects are expected to play an important role in high-performance CFCs. Indeed, multifunctional lithium materials are being constantly developed for fuel cell devices. Ganesan et al. found that LiNiO2 had high catalytic activity for the ORR at 650 °C for molten carbonate fuel cells[47]. Fan et al. found that LiNiO2-based materials modified by copper, iron and cobalt oxides obtained better electrocatalytic activities and faster charge transfer and gas diffusion rates[41]. Additional transition metal elements could be further introduced into LiNiO2 (separately or simultaneously) based on the advanced NANOCOFC (nanocomposites for advanced fuel cell technology) concept. The as-designed cathode candidates, e.g., lithiated NiCuZnOx (LNCZO), showed high compatibility with ceria-carbonate composite electrolyte for low-temperature applications[41]. Jing et al. prepared LNCZO by a slurry method, which was used as the cathode and anode simultaneously[18]. In this report, a samarium-doped NSDC was used as an electrolyte with LNCZ-NSDC symmetrical electrodes. The device achieved a maximum power density of 1000 mW/cm2 at 470 °C[18]. In another work, a novel hierarchically porous LNCZO was designed as symmetrical electrodes matched to the SDC-LiNaCO3 (LNSDC) electrolyte in CFC, achieving a maximum power density of 132 mW/cm2 at 550 °C. It was demonstrated that the LNCZO exhibited excellent cathode performance[19]. A new triple (H+, O2- and e-)-conducting cathode with layer-structured LiNi0.8Co0.2O2 (LNCoO) also showed good ORR activity. The low activation energy (0.88 eV) and evident water uptake capability made the catalytic activity higher than for most cathode materials[17].

    NCAL is currently the most widely used symmetric electrode and is compatible with most electrolyte materials in low-temperature CFCs, as shown in Figure 6B. The layered oxide NCAL possesses a crystal structure similar to LNCoO but with improved ORR activity due to the incorporation of Al3+[48]. Yuan et al. prepared a uniform NCAL layer on nickel foam by introducing a new coating spraying technology, namely, low-pressure plasma spraying, which was used as an electrode catalytic coating in low-temperature fuel cells[49]. Chen et al. further revealed that the NCAL electrode had good activity for both the ORR and HOR[50]. Furthermore, layered oxide Li(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)O2 (LNCM) has been developed as an electrode for symmetric CFCs, which provided lower area-specific resistance than that of a NCAL electrode. LNCM is also a suitable electrode that is compatible with both SDC and BZY, with a power density of 641 mW/cm2 obtained at 525 °C in a SDC-based symmetric CFC[51]. Furthermore, a layer-structured LiCoO2-LiFeO2 heterostructure-based composite was employed as a cathode in a CFC and could be combined with SDC as a composite electrolyte, showing 162 mW/cm2 at 550 °C. The application of dual-phase-layered lithium-ion composites presents a new direction for the development of high-performance CFCs[52].

    LIB materials for CFC electrolytes

    With the successful application of LIB materials as electrodes for low-temperature CFCs, matching electrolytes are also constantly being discovered. The structure of such a CFC is shown in Figure 6C. LIB materials as electrolytes bring surprising electrical properties to CFCs. A chemically stable LiAlO2-LiNaCO3 composite electrolyte was developed to replace doped ceria materials. As Raza et al. reported, pure LiAlO2 (LAO) is an oxygen ionic insulator and the detected current output in the composite electrolyte-based device was mainly from the proton contribution[53]. Zhang et al. introduced NCAL into a Ce0.8Sm0.2O2-δ-Na2CO3 electrolyte to eliminate the polarization between different interfaces[54]. The device reached a high-power density of 1072 mW/cm2 at 550 °C based on symmetrical NCAL electrodes. Such research demonstrates the extraordinary electrocatalytic and ion-transport ability of NCAL, which can act as both an electrode and electrolyte[54]. Furthermore, Lan et al. reported a new ionic conducting material, namely, an α-LiFeO2/γ-LiAlO2 composite, as an electrolyte for CFCs[55]. The composite exhibited O2- and H+ co-ionic conduction, reaching 0.50 S/cm at 650 °C under H2/air fuel cell conditions[55]. Zhu et al. added different contents of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) to a LaCePr oxide and NCAL composite electrolyte[56]. PVDF was used to improve the triple-phase boundary (TPB) to obtain good electrical performance. The cell achieved a power density of 982 mW/cm2 at 520 °C[56]. A Li-doped ZnO (LZO)/SDC electrolyte showed superionic conductivity (> 0.1 S/cm over 300 °C) without electron leakage and excellent electrolytic performance (400-630 mW/cm2) was recorded between 480 and 550 °C[57]. Tu et al. further revealed that a LZO/SDC composite had a hybrid H+ and O2- conducting capability with predominantly H+ conduction[58]. The proton/Li+ conductor electrolyte was composed of two-dimensional LiAl0.5Co0.5O2 (LACO) nanosheets and amorphous LAO layers. The cell delivered an extremely high Pmax of 1120 mW/cm2 at 550 °C. The as-designed LAO-coating on LACO can modify the space-charge regions and improve the chemical stability and ionic conductivity of LACO[59]. Representative novel CFC configurations and their excellent properties are summarized in Table 1.

    Table 1

    List of excellent electrical properties of LIB materials in CFCs

    Electrode (anode/cathode)ElectrolytePerformance tem.Ref.
    AgLiMnO-LiZnO-SDC210 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[60]
    SDC-LiNiMnSr422 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[46]
    MgZnO-SDC-LiNiCuSrO600 mW cm-2 at 630 °C[43]
    GDC-KZnAl-LiNiCuZnOx628 mW cm-2 at 580 °C[42]
    LiNiCuZnO-SDC-(Li/Na)2CO3260 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[61]
    LixAlCoO2382 mW cm-2 at 650 °C[62]
    Ni foamSDC-LaSrTiO-NCAL222 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[63]
    Ag/Ni foamLiNiZnO-SDC600 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[39]
    Ag/Ni foamLiNiFe oxide-SDC760 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[45]
    Ni-NCALNCAL-ZnO-SnO21267 mW cm-2 at 530 °C[64]
    NCAL-SDC735 mW cm-2 at 520 °C[65]
    LiNiO-SDC688 mW cm-2 at 530 °C[66]
    SDC900 mW cm-2 at 650 °C[67]
    CuFe oxide-LiZnO-SDC637 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[68]
    LiMgCoO-SDC700 mW cm-2 at 600 °C[69]
    SDC-Na2CO3-NCAL1072 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[54]
    α-Fe2O3-NCAL554 mW cm-2 at 600 °C[70]
    LiZnO-SDC713 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[58]
    LiAlO-LiAlCoO1120 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[59]
    LiZnO443 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[71]
    SDC-SrTiO3892 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[72]
    Ni-doped Sm2O31438 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[31]
    Ni-LxNCASDC761 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[25]
    Lithiated NiCuZnOxSDC-(Li/Na)2CO3680 mW cm-2 at 600 °C[41]
    Ni-LiNiCoMnOSDC815 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[51]
    LiNiCuZnOSDC-LiZnO630 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[57]
    SDC-LiCoO2-LiFeO2714 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[52]
    NiO-CuO composition
    LiAlO2-LiNaCO3388 mW cm-2 at 600 °C[53]
    Ni-LiNiCoO-SDC- Na2CO3/NCALSDC-Na2CO3-LiNiCoO1000 mW cm-2 at 550 °C[10]


    Ion transmission mechanism of LIB materials in CFCs

    With the application of LIB materials to fuel cells, validating the conduction mechanism of the ionic species under CFC working conditions has become an attractive research frontier. Thus, a review on this topic would provide informative guidance for the rational design and selection of functional materials. Based on the crosslinking between Li+ and H+ migration introduced above, most LIB materials used as electrolytes in fuel cells have a layered structure. From the report of Lan et al., protons can be inserted into the Li-deficient LixAl0.5Co0.5O2 layer to form LixHyAl0.5Co0.5O2 at a high temperature, as shown in Figure 7A[62]. The proton conductivity of 0.1 S/cm obtained at 500 °C is higher than that of conventional proton-conducting polycrystalline oxides in the same temperature range. The proton intercalation conduction mechanism is different from the oxygen vacancy conduction mechanism in conventional perovskites and doped ceria materials. Aluminum replaced some cobalt sites in LiCoO2, which generated a stable sublattice matrix with strongly suppressed electronic conduction. The intrinsic layered structure was well retained and could provide sufficient channels for proton migration. However, the loss of lithium at high temperatures is still a challenging issue. More chemically stable elements (e.g., sodium, potassium and so on) should be considered as alternatives to lithium to achieve more stable proton conductor electrolytes for CFCs[62].

    Figure 7. Proton conducting transformation of LIB material for the electrolyte of CFCs. (A) Insertion in LixAl0.5Co0.5O2 in H2. Copyright from Ref.[64]. (B) Transmission in interfacial region between LAO-LACO membrane. Copyright from Ref.[62].

    When the electrolyte is composed of a single-phase material, the ion transport usually relies on its crystal structure and the number of intrinsic defects. In recent years, two-phase composites have also been developed as efficient ion conductors, albeit with different conduction mechanisms. As a good example, an α-LiFeO2/γ-LiAlO2 composite was reported as a novel electrolyte for CFCs. The conductivity of this composite was reasonably high (0.24-0.50 S/cm) at 600-650 °C and orders of magnitude higher than single-phase LiFeO2 or LiAlO2. Moreover, it was found that Li+, O2- and H+ ions, as well as electrons, contributed simultaneously to the total conductivity. During the operation of the fuel cell device, both O2- and H+ conduction was clearly detected and the potential difference as a kinetic driving force increased the mobility of O2- (or H+) ions in LiFeO2 grains or along the grain boundaries. The possible pathways of ions include the oxygen vacancies in reduced LiFeO2 and the defects at the LiFeO2/LiAlO2 interface. The combination of semiconducting LiFeO2 and insulating LAO generated a superionic conductor that provides a new direction for the design of novel ionic conducting materials for CFCs[55]. Similarly, Paydar et al. reported that proton- and Li+-conducting LACO nanosheets coated by a compatible amorphous LAO electrolyte illustrated excellent performance (Pmax of 1120 mW/cm2 at 550 °C) and improved chemical stability[59]. The coated core-shell structure and the interface achieved better chemical compatibility for the LAO-LACO composite electrolyte with the NCAL electrode. The special structure made Li+ more mobile in LAO than in LACO. The imbalanced charge distribution induced Li+ diffusion from the interface of LAO to the surface of LACO, as shown in Figure 7B. A local electric field was produced by this chemical potential gradient, speeding up H+ insertion into LAO simultaneously. In addition, Li+ diffusion on the particle surface region can make a positively charged surface on the LAO-LACO particles, which resist H+ from further ingressing into LACO, resulting in a proton interfacial conduction mechanism. The local electric field accelerated proton transport through the interface of LAO/LACO[59]. These studies suggest the strong correlation of transport paths between Li ions and protons, and moreover, they are helpful for exploring the conduction mechanisms of ions in fuel cells.

    BIEF on LIB materials used in CFCs

    The type of composite electrolyte is related to the composite of LIB materials with ionic conductors/semiconductors. For instance, a LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2/Sm0.2Ce0.8O2-δ composite electrolyte was designed using well-tuned energy band structures, thereby providing a promising methodology. A high ionic conductivity (0.12 S/cm at 520 °C) was obtained by 0.5LNCA-1.5SDC in its optimal weight ratio. The heterostructure and reconstruction of energy bands at the two-phase interface play crucial roles in enhancing the ionic conduction and improving the electronic performance of the device[65]. In a subsequent study, Liu et al. revealed that the ionic conductivity in the composite was higher than the electronic conductivity by orders of magnitude, which exhibited an obvious blocking effect on electrons by the well-tuned heterojunction[73]. LNCA-SDC was also identified as a hybrid oxygen ion/proton conducting material[73]. In addition, Li-doped ZnO as the electrolyte achieved a remarkable Pmax of 443 mW/cm2 along with an OCV of 1.07 V at 550 °C[71]. Furthermore, a novel p-n-n heterostructure composite based on p-type NCAL, n-type ZnO and n-type SnO2 gained the homogenous elemental distribution and heterointerfaces, as well as a greatly increased oxygen vacancy concentration, as shown in Figure 8A. The optimized composition of 2NCAL-1(ZnO-SnO2) showed a high ionic conductivity of 0.389 S/cm at 530 °C[64].

    Figure 8. Working mechanism of lithium anode in CFCs. (A) Schottky junction of general metal/semiconductor (left) and H2-reduced lithium anode/semiconductor (right). Copyright from Ref.[10]. (B) Energy band alignment effect for acceleration processes of p-n-n heterostructure NCAL-ZnO-SnO2 electrolyte. Copyright from Ref.[59].

    Generally, the junction effect can be formed by the contact between p- and n-type semiconductors. The redistribution of charges at the interface can generate a space-charge region, with a BIEF pointed from n- to p-type. By the energy band alignment effect and BIEF, the electronic blocking and ionic acceleration processes are illustrated in Figure 8B. A BIEF can also be formed when utilizing LIB materials as the semiconductor.

    Although LIB materials have been widely used as symmetric electrodes in CFCs, the working mechanisms vary under different conditions. For NCAL used as an anode, the lattice structure decomposed in a reducing atmosphere but no significant phase change can be observed as a cathode in fuel cells. These phenomena have raised wide concerns because of the non-negligible effects on the stable operation of fuel cells. As reported by Zhu et al., the structure of Ni-foam/LiNi0.85Co0.15O2-δ (LCN)-NSDC/Ag was designed as a novel Schottky junction fuel cell, as shown in Figure 8B[10]. Based on the principle of a Schottky junction [Figure 8B, left], a potential was built up at the interface between the metal and semiconductor. The metallization of the Ni-containing oxide to Ni helped to catalyze H2 oxidation on the anode, which formed a remarkable Schottky junction effect with the p-type LCN [Figure 8B, right]. The Schottky junction-induced BIEF played a key role in preventing electrons from passing through the device and accelerating the H+ transport. Even though silver can function as a cathode, NCAL delivered much better electrochemical performance after replacing the silver cathode[10].

    ORR and HOR of LIB materials in CFCs

    With the application of LIB materials in CFCs, these materials can play the role of electrodes at low temperatures. In CFCs, the ORR at the cathode and the HOR at the anode are key factors affecting the properties of the device. Highly efficient redox reactions in LIB material-based electrodes directly reduce the operating temperature of CFCs and thus these electrodes are suitable for more electrolytes. Therefore, the discussion of the working mechanism of LIB materials as electrodes is of great significance. The enhancement of the catalytic activity of electrodes is an important research topic for conventional CFCs, and this principle should also be considered when utilizing LIB materials as novel CFC electrodes.

    The excellent electrochemical performance of NCAL has been observed in many advanced CFC devices due to its high catalytic performance, strong compatibility with the electrolyte and long-term stability. For instance, when NCAL was used as the anode to replace the Pt anode, the Pmax of the device was 32 times higher than that of the Pt anode-coated cell and the ionic conductivity of the electrolyte achieved a 4.4-fold enhancement. Actually, the Li+ in NCAL has critical effects on the oxidation state and catalytic function. When the NCAL anode was subjected to H2 reduction, the as-formed chemical potential gradient can drive the diffusion of Li+ into the electrolyte. For example, LiOH and Li2CO3 produced from NCAL covered the interface of GDC grains, which can form abundant channels for rapid ion transport[74]. The bulk conduction mechanism of the GDC electrolyte was changed to an efficient ionic interface conduction mechanism due to the formation of a composite material of LiOH/Li2CO3 in GDC. Li ions accumulated in the multi-phase interface due to their diffusion, resulting in the formation of a SCL. By the principle of electric neutrality, high oxygen vacancy concentrations can be produced to compensate for the loss of the positive charge. The continuous interface network with high oxygen vacancy concentrations provided rapid ionic conduction channels for increasing the ionic conductivity in the GDC electrolyte.

    To investigate the effect of lithium by-products on the device, according to the work of Liu et al.,LixNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2-δ (LxNCA, x = 1.0, 1.2 or 1.4) with different lithium contents was designed and prepared as symmetrical electrodes in CFCs[20]. The by-products of the NCAL anode under a reducing atmosphere included Li2CO2, LiOH and so on. The excessive Li-ion content showed a greater impact on the cathode performance than on the anode[20]. This is because Li2CO3 and a cation-disordered “NiO-like” shell were formed due to the exposure of NCAL to air, leading to a lower activation energy for the ORR and a higher oxygen ion conductivity[50]. Compared with state-of-the-art CFC cathode materials (e.g., LSCF), NCAL displayed a higher ORR activity[75] because lithium-ion migration driven by the chemical potential formed a SCL, which enhanced the number of oxygen vacancies at the interface between the cathode and electrolyte. This mechanism facilitated oxygen-ion conduction and reduced the polarization resistance of NCAL[76]. Based on the reports of NCAL symmetrical electrodes and their catalytic function, the migration of Li+ has been confirmed during the fuel cell working process. There might be a certain connection between Li+ and other carriers and the migration mode of Li+ may have significant effects on the H+/O2-/e- triple-phase carriers. Therefore, the migration mechanism of Li+ is also of interest in fuel cells.

    As revealed by Xia et al., NCAL was considered as a typical lithiated transition metal oxide with triple (H+/O2-/e-)-conducting properties and ORR activity[70]. The TPB of the electrode regions can be significantly extended under cell operating conditions; thus, the electrode polarizations were decreased accordingly. In addition, the high mobility of Li+ in NCAL also dynamically promoted the O2-/H+ transmission[70]. Usually, the ORR on the cathode is categorized into four types of H-CFCs, which involve (a) pure electronic conductors (e.g., Pt); (b) mixed ionic and electronic conductors, including Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-δ and La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ (LSCF); (c) mixed protonic and electronic conductors; and (d) triple-conducting oxides that possess three charge carriers, i.e., oxygen ions (O2-), protons (H+) and electrons (e-) simultaneously in one single-phase material. Triple-conducting cathodes seem to be the most promising class for obtaining high cell performance. As Figure 9 shows, the protons originate from the unique layered structure and the intrinsic high oxygen transport kinetics result in a fast reaction rate of H2O. The heavy doping of transition metals/alkaline earth metals (Ni, Mn, Cu, Fe, Co and so on) can satisfy sufficient electronic conduction while increasing the electrode catalytic activity. The conductivity and electrode activities of lithiated doped alkali metals can be improved further. For the LiNi0.8CoO2 cathode, the e-/h+ conductivity and oxygen vacancies were improved by high Ni3+ content. Moreover, the protons were driven by lithium intercalation into the layered structure of lithiated oxide and transported by the interspace between two adjacent NiO layers[17].

    Figure 9. Schematic illustration of oxygen reduction and water generation pathways of triple-conducting (H+/O2-/e-) LiNi0.8Co0.2O2 cathode for CFCs. Copyright from Ref.[17]. CFCs: Ceramic fuel cells.

    A liquid-phase approach to improve interfacial ion transport efficiency

    The liquid-like filling method is widely used in many electrochemical devices, which allows the liquid target substance to fill into the medium uniformly and later solidify. The liquid target substance can connect different components of the device tightly and reduce the interfacial resistance to transport ions efficiently. Wei et al. designed a capillary action mechanism to enhance the electrolyte density [Figure 10], stating that a liquid phase from the electrode could flow into the narrow space of the electrolyte without the assistance of external forces[77]. Based on this principle, a cell with a NCAL/SDC/NiO structure (where 0.5-1.0 wt.% LiOH was added into the NiO anode) was constructed. LiOH was in the liquid state at the cell operating temperature (550 °C), which filled up the pores and gaps in the electrolyte formed by dry pressing. The electrolyte thus became gas-tight and had the ability to separate the fuel and the oxidant. This mechanism provides a good direction to understand the transport process of Li ions in the NCAL anode[77]. In fact, a similar approach is used to improve the ionic conductivity in LIBs. The novel electrolyte filling technology could produce supercapacitors and energy density with a photoinitiator coating on the surface of porous carbon nanotubes. The flowing gel polymer electrolytes penetrated into the pores inside the electrode due to gravity. This method provided oxygen diffusion channels[78]. Furthermore, solidification is a similar method to convert a liquid into a solid in the solid battery. The liquid precursor with high mobility can fill the voids at the electrode/electrolyte interface and infiltrate the porous cathode. After solidification, the solid components can contact continuously for fluent charge transport and the solid-state batteries can be maximally maintained. This novel method can help to solve the crucial interfacial issues that are related to the rigid and heterogeneous solid-solid contacts between the electrolytes and electrodes[79]. As a general strategy, the developed liquid-phase approach showed large-scale industrial prospects for high-efficiency energy applications. The liquid method can promote the reaction sufficiently in solutions and produce homogenous precursors[80]. The liquid-phase approach is always used to achieve better electrode/electrolyte interfacial contact, thus improving the performance of fuel cells and batteries. This method is also a fine example of the crosslinking between CFCs and LIBs in terms of performance improvement processes.

    Figure 10. The capillary action mechanism of lithium material electrode in CFCs. Copyright from Ref.[77]. CFCs: Ceramic fuel cells.


    As powerful energy storage systems, LIBs can be classified as Li-sulfur batteries, Li-air batteries, organic electrode batteries, solid-state batteries or Li-CO2 batteries[81]. Although LIB techniques have been widely studied, the safety issues induced by liquid-based electrolytes have still not been well addressed. LIBs composed of organic solution electrolytes are prone to leakage and combustion, leading to a series of environmental problems. The development of all-solid-state batteries could be an alternative strategy to avoid these drawbacks, in addition to improved mechanical strength, chemical stability and conductivity (10-4 to 10-3 S/cm)[82]. The LIB materials transforming into proton conductors mean that their electrochemical properties (e.g., lithium-ion conductivity) have attracted more attention. LIB materials play different roles in all-solid-state batteries, including the cathode, anode and electrolyte. Typical LIB materials are introduced by their roles, which provide a reference for the application of CFCs.

    Typical LIB electrolyte materials

    The solid-state electrolyte is a critical component to block electron leakage while transporting lithium ions, which is similar to the electrolytes in CFCs. Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) is one of the most widely investigated solid electrolytes with a garnet-type structure. The ionic conductivities of the cubic and tetragonal phases of LLZO are 10-4 and 10-6 S/cm, respectively[83]. However, LLZO cannot retain a stable crystal structure in air, which is mainly due to the reaction of LLZO with CO2 in air to produce a Li2CO3 passivation layer. The formation of passivation layers reduces ionic conductivity and increases interfacial resistance. Furthermore, NASICONs (sodium super ion conductors), such as LiZr2(PO4)3, LiGe2(PO4)3 and Li1.5Al0.5Ti1.5PO4, have an analogous crystalline structure with the space group of R-3C. For Li1.5Al0.5Ti1.5PO4, the PO4 tetrahedra alternate and corner share with [TiO6] octahedra, where the Li species occupy interstitial sites[84]. In addition, Li-S batteries have attracted significant interest due to their high theoretical energy density and gravimetric capacity[14]. Furthermore, widely-used sulfide (Li2S-SiS2 and Li2S-P2S5) and perovskite (LiLaTiO3) materials have shown higher conductivity (10-2 S/cm), lower grain boundary resistance and excellent flexibility[33]. In 1979, a Li salt complexed with a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) was used in the first all-solid-state film battery. The SPE usually consists of a polymer matrix and lithium salts[85]. The all-solid-state polymer electrolyte and quasi-solid-state polymer electrolyte are attractive candidates for Li-S cells with excellent flexibility and mechanical stability[86]. With the continuous development of this field, polymer electrolyte materials with different kinds of transporting ions (e.g., H+, Li+, Na+, K+ and Ag+) have been explored extensively in academia and industry. SPEs have also shown significant potential for a variety of solid-state power sources, such as secondary batteries, fuel cells and supercapacitors[87]. The special structures of LIB electrolytes with different ion transport mechanisms make it possible for their practical use in CFCs. Good Li-ion conductivity of the materials is an ideal property for CFCs.

    Typical LIB electrode materials

    In LIBs, the basis of the power supply comes from the Li-ion shuttle between the electrode materials; thus, the electrode performance can be evaluated by the Li-ion insertion ability. The electrode material can be divided into three types: intercalation; conversion; alloying[88].

    Intercalation-type electrode materials mainly provide intercalation and deintercalation sites for Li+ in the lattice, which is usually dominated by layered structure materials, with the most representative materials including LiNiO2 and LiCoO2[89]. The layered structure facilitates the diffusion and insertion of Li ions, accelerating the battery charging speed. LiCoO2 as the most famous electrode material was invented by Goodenough and coworkers in the 1980s, which led to a significant increase in the battery voltage (4 V) compared with previous ones (< 2.5 V)[23]. Subsequently, LiMn2O4, as another famous three-dimensional spinel-structured electrode material, achieved a reduced cost. The crystal structure of LiMn2O4 is similar to LiCoO2 and possesses a cubic close-packed oxygen lattice with edge-sharing octahedra, as well as excellent Li+ and electronic conductivities[90]. Generally, the transition metal elements in layered materials can induce a change in the valence states (e.g., Ni3+ to Ni2+ in LiNiO2) during the processes of Li+ intercalation and deintercalation, leading to disordered cation sites in the crystal. Studies have shown that the disorder can disrupt the transport path of lithium ions and with the effect of the electrostatic repulsion between transition metal elements, the Li mobility can be significantly reduced. Simultaneously, the Li slab space can also be reduced due to the disorder effect, resulting in a high activation barrier to Li-ion diffusion[91]. To address these challenges, the doping of polymetallic elements was developed to stabilize the crystal structure, and thus the disadvantage of single doping can be avoided with additional advantages, e.g., enhanced electrical properties. Recently, LiNixCoyMn1-x-yO2 (NCM)[92] and LiNixCoyAl1-x-yO2 (NCA) have attracted significant attention as new-generation LIB electrodes because of their higher specific capacity and energy density[93]. For example, the optimized composition of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 has been used in Tesla’s electric vehicles with improved cost-effectiveness. The addition of low-cost transition metals (e.g., Ni2+ and Al3+) not only increased its specific capacity, but also solved the safety issue related to the O2 evolution from the material. Additionally, NMC with the same crystal structure has been commercialized for the electronics to electric vehicles applications due to its high volumetric and gravimetric capacity, high nominal voltage and low self-discharge[94].

    There are numerous transition metal oxides, nitrogen compounds, sulfides and phosphides that can be classified as the conversion-type anodes. In conversion-type materials, the structural change induced by chemical interactions is usually irreversible due to the conversion reaction between Li+ and the corresponding element without the provision of intercalation sites, but offers a large area for rapid diffusion of Li+ at the surface of the anode and electrolyte[95]. Simultaneously, the charge transport motion mechanics can be enhanced by the exposed active surface. Several newly-developed anodes containing large polyanions (XO4)y- (X = S, P, Si, As, Mo or W) can promote the ORR and stabilize the lattice structure. However, polyanion-containing anodes still have shortcomings, such as poor electronic conductivity compared with intercalation-type ones[96]. Furthermore, Li+ diffuses in one dimension, resulting in lower lithium-ion conductivity in LiFePO4. Recently, surface decoration with carbon materials has been identified as an effective strategy to improve the conductivity of LiFePO4. LiFePO4 has promoted the development of other anionic materials in lithium-/sodium-ion batteries, such as LiMnPO4, Na2FePO4F, Na3V2(PO4)2F3 and Li2MSiO4 (M = Mn, Fe, Co or Ni)[97]. Compared with the less stable high-valent redox couples (Co3+/4+ and Ni3+/4+), the low-valent redox couples (Fe2+/3+) are more stable. The stronger bonding from large polyanions can inhibit oxygen release from the lattice and enhance the thermal stability.

    The third type of LIB electrode material is alloys, where lithium always reacts with the IVA, VA groups of alloys, including Si, Ge, Sn, Pb, P, As, Sb and Bi. In addition, Sn-Si hybrid materials have shown both high specific capacity and good cycle stability for potential applications in electric vehicles[98]. Ni- and Co-based oxynitrides can be readily prepared as stable and dendrite-free lithium anodes, which keep the battery safe and maintain a high specific energy. A nitride of Li3N can be in-situ formed by NiCoON, which can enhance the electronic and ionic conductivity for the kinetic induction of the homogeneous deposition of Li[99]. In fact, multi-element doping is beneficial to increasing the ion conductivity and enhances the catalysis in CFCs. The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) plays an important role in the long-term durability of the battery, by which the electrolyte component can be readily protected from decomposition by forming solid products at the interface (i.e., a passivation layer). However, the complex reduction pathways of multiple components in the electrolyte can form random SEIs and unstable SEIs can bring continuous cracking and reconstruction[100]. Some reports showed that the formation of the SEI layer is highly related to the inorganic components (MF and M2CO3, M = Li, Na or K) and the MF has a critical function in improving the interfacial stability. Therefore, constructing stable SEI films on the electrode surface to achieve a stabilized microstructure deserves more attention[101]. In addition, organic electrode materials are becoming more popular because of their advantages of low cost, safety, environmental friendliness, design diversity and low-temperature applications[102]. Modulating lithiophilicity at the electrode/electrolyte interface can improve the interfacial Li mobility, where in-situ formed polymers in contact with the anode are highly flexible[103]. In addition, the next generation of LIB electrodes has been developed, as shown in Figure 11[104], and the more competitive LIB materials with excellent properties are listed in Table 2.

    Figure 11. Voltage versus capacity for electrode materials presently used in LIBs. Copyright from Ref.[104]. LIBs: Lithium-ion batteries.

    Table 2

    Commonly used lithium electrode/electrolyte materials (the conductivity for the electrolytes is ionic conductivity and for the electrodes is electronic conductivity)

    ApplicationStructureMaterialProperties of lithium material Ref.
    ElectrolyteGarnetLi7La3Zr2O12Ionic conductivity of 10-4 S/cm[83]
    Li5La3M2O12 (M = Nb, Ta) Ionic conductivity of 10-6 S/cm[105]
    Li6.5La3Zr1.5Ta0.5O12Ionic conductivity of 1.27 × 10-3 S/cm[106]
    NASICONLi1.5Al0.5Ti1.5PO4Ionic conductivity of 7 × 10-4 S/cm[84]
    PerovskiteLiLaTiO3Ionic conductivity of 10-2 S/cm[33]
    LISICONLi14ZnGe4O16Ionic conductivity of 10-7 S/cm[107]
    ElectrodeLayeredLiNiO2Theoretical specific capacity of 275 mAh/g[108]
    LiCoO2Ionic conductivity of 10-3 S/cm[109]
    LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2Initial discharge capacity of 201.2 mAh/g[110]
    LiNixMnyCo1-x-yO2Specific capacity 122.21 mA h/g[111]
    OlivineLiFePO4Ionic conductivity of 5 × 10-8 S/cm[112]
    LiMnPO4Specific capacity 168 mAh/g[113]
    SpinelLiMn2O4Ionic conductivity of 1.81 × 10-4 S/cm[114]
    TavoriteLiFeSO4FIonic conductivity of 1.65 × 10-4 S/cm[15]

    It is noteworthy that the special structure of a LIB material as an electrode forms the transport pathway of Li+ and the improved interface between the electrode and electrolyte can promote the diffusion of Li+. These mechanisms are particularly relevant and can be crosslinked to CFCs. Based on the good electrochemical properties of LIB materials, some of them have been successfully used in fuel cells and played better roles at lower operating temperatures.


    The works discussed in this review have opened a new way and methodology for the rational design of new ionic conductors and functional materials with tuned energy band structures. The application of LIB materials in fuel cells is a valuable and promising crosslink research field. Based on the state-of-the-art research and development, the unique semiconductor properties of the electrodes, e.g., DOS and band, as well as BIEF, relevant crystal structure, electrical properties and electron/ion coupling properties, are the keys and common scientific principles to support their applications in CFCs. Among them, layer-structured LIB materials (e.g., NCAL and LiCoO2) play the important roles of electrode and electrolyte in CFCs and facilitate proton transport and HOR/ORR functions, leading to enhanced power outputs. It is expected that layered materials, such as LiTiO2, LiNiO2 or lithium garnet-type oxide LLZO, with optimized electronic and ionic conductivities can be well applied to next-generation fuel cells. From the perspective of materials design, the doping strategy with transition metal elements cannot only enhance the catalytic function of the raw material, but also reduce the production cost and stabilize the crystal structure to obtain more durable CFC devices. In parallel, the development of heterostructure composites[115] for surface and interface functionalities can further develop multiple functions of these materials for practical applications. In addition, spinel-, garnet- and perovskite-type crystal structures also played a significant role in promoting ion transport in the electrolytes of CFCs. Some polyanionic sulfates and fluorides show a high affinity for protons due to the enrichment of anionic groups, thereby promoting the proton transport process.

    In LIBs, the development of new structured materials to facilitate the intercalation and deintercalation of lithium ions has been identified as an important research direction. In fuel cells, the migration of lithium ions also has a significant impact on cell performance, which deserves further in-depth studies. The layered crystal structure promoting the migration of lithium ions can also generate highly efficient migration paths for protons[62]. The reported high-performance CFCs using LIB materials as electrolytes and electrodes possess a similar physical structure to advanced all-solid-state lithium batteries. The participation of lithium and the resultant products have shown a promotion effect on the ion transport and thus the energy conversion efficiency of fuel cells[116]. The coupling effect between lithium ions and electrons was regarded as the key to improving the energy storage in the battery. In contrast, in semiconductor membrane-based fuel cells employing LIB materials, the coupling mechanism cannot only increase the ionic conductivity, but also improve the energy conversion efficiency. Figure 12 summarizes the strong correlation of working mechanisms between LIBs and CFCs, illustrating the potential of lithium materials for common applications in both devices. More LIB materials are expected to have significant potential for further research and development in advanced CFCs.

    Figure 12. A summary of the advanced applications of LIB materials in CFCs.


    Authors’ contributions

    Conceived and designed the manuscript: Wang B

    Prepared tables: Yang J, Wang R

    Prepared figures: Zhou X, Yang J, Wang R

    Discussed and commented on the manuscript: Zhang W, Yun S, Wang B

    Wrote the paper: Zhou X, Zhang W

    All authors participated in the data analysis and results discussions, and commented on the manuscript.

    Availability of data and materials

    Not applicable.

    Financial support and sponsorship

    National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51872080), Key Program for International S&T Cooperation Projects of Shaanxi Province (2019KWZ-03), Key Program for Nature Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2019JZ-20), and Key Science and Technology Innovation Team of Shaanxi Province (2022TD-34).

    Conflicts of interest

    All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.


    ©The Author(s) 2022.


    • 1. Cao X, Zhang L, Huang K, Zhang B, Wu J, Huang Y. Strained carbon steel as a highly efficient catalyst for seawater electrolysis. Energy Mater 2022;2:200010.

    • 2. Zhu B, Mi Y, Xia C, et al. A nanoscale perspective on solid oxide and semiconductor membrane fuel cells: materials and technology. Energy Mater 2022;1:100002.

    • 3. Stambouli A, Traversa E. Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs): a review of an environmentally clean and efficient source of energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2002;6:433-55.

    • 4. Chang H, Wu Y, Han X, Yi T. Recent developments in advanced anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Mater 2022;1:100003.

    • 5. Maleki H, Howard JN. Role of the cathode and anode in heat generation of Li-ion cells as a function of state of charge. J Power Sources 2004;137:117-27.

    • 6. Curi M, Ferraz H, Furtado J, Secchi A. Dispersant effects on YSZ electrolyte characteristics for solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram Int 2015;41:6141-8.

    • 7. Raza R, Zhu B, Rafique A, Naqvi MR, Lund P. Functional ceria-based nanocomposites for advanced low-temperature (300-600 °C) solid oxide fuel cell: a comprehensive review. Mater Today Energy 2020;15:100373.

    • 8. Sebastian L, Jayashree RS, Gopalakrishnan J. Probing the mobility of lithium in LISICON: Li+/H+ exchange studies in Li2 ZnGeO4 and Li2+2x Zn1-xGeO4. J Mater Chem 2003;13:1400-5.

    • 9. Wei T, Zhang LA, Chen Y, Yang P, Liu M. Promising proton conductor for intermediate-temperature fuel cells: Li13.9Sr0.1Zn(GeO4)4. Chem Mater 2017;29:1490-5.

    • 10. Zhu B, Lund PD, Raza R, et al. Schottky junction effect on high performance fuel cells based on nanocomposite materials. Adv Energy Mater 2015;5:1401895.

    • 11. Ensling D, Cherkashinin G, Schmid S, Bhuvaneswari S, Thissen A, Jaegermann W. Nonrigid band behavior of the electronic structure of LiCoO2 thin film during electrochemical li deintercalation. Chem Mater 2014;26:3948-56.

    • 12. Manthiram A, Goodenough JB. Lithium-based polyanion oxide cathodes. Nat Energy 2021;6:844-5.

    • 13. Xia T, Zhang W, Murowchick J, Liu G, Chen X. Built-in electric field-assisted surface-amorphized nanocrystals for high-rate lithium-ion battery. Nano Lett 2013;13:5289-96.

    • 14. Ruan J, Sun H, Song Y, et al. Constructing 1D/2D interwoven carbonous matrix to enable high-efficiency sulfur immobilization in Li-S battery. Energy Mater 2022;1:100018.

    • 15. Guo Z, Zhang D, Qiu H, et al. Improved cycle stability and rate capability of graphene oxide wrapped tavorite LiFeSO4 F as cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2015;7:13972-9.

    • 16. Wang L, Xie R, Chen B, et al. In-situ visualization of the space-charge-layer effect on interfacial lithium-ion transport in all-solid-state batteries. Nat Commun 2020;11:5889.

      DOIPubMed PMC
    • 17. Fan L, Su P. Layer-structured LiNi0.8Co0.2O2: A new triple (H+/O2-/e-) conducting cathode for low temperature proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 2016;306:369-77.

    • 18. Jing Y, Qin H, Liu Q, Singh M, Zhu B. Synthesis and electrochemical performances of LiNiCuZn oxides as anode and cathode catalyst for low temperature solid oxide fuel cell. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2012;12:5102-5.

    • 19. Zhao Y, He Y, Fan L, et al. Synthesis of hierarchically porous LiNiCuZn-oxide and its electrochemical performance for low-temperature fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2014;39:12317-22.

    • 20. Liu X, Dong W, Tong Y, et al. Li effects on layer-structured oxide LixNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2-δ: improving cell performance via on-line reaction. Electrochim Acta 2019;295:325-32.

    • 21. Mushtaq N, Lu Y, Xia C, et al. Design principle and assessing the correlations in Sb-doped Ba0.5Sr0.5FeO3-δ perovskite oxide for enhanced oxygen reduction catalytic performance. J Catal 2021;395:168-77.

    • 22. Zhu B, Fan L, Mushtaq N, et al. Semiconductor electrochemistry for clean energy conversion and storage. Electrochem Energy Rev 2021;4:757-92.

    • 23. Goodenough JB, Park KS. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135:1167-76.

    • 24. Becker D, Cherkashinin G, Hausbrand R, Jaegermann W. Adsorption of diethyl carbonate on LiCoO2 thin films: formation of the electrochemical interface. J Phys Chem C 2014;118:962-7.

    • 25. Wang B, Zhu B, Yun S, et al. Fast ionic conduction in semiconductor CeO2-δ electrolyte fuel cells. NPG Asia Mater 2019;11.

    • 26. Xing Y, Hu E, Wang F, et al. Cubic silicon carbide/zinc oxide heterostructure fuel cells. Appl Phys Lett 2020;117:162105.

    • 27. Lu Y, Zhu B, Shi J, Yun S. Advanced low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells based on a built-in electric field. Energy Mater 2022;1:100007.

    • 28. Gao B, Jalem R, Ma Y, Tateyama Y. Li+ Transport mechanism at the heterogeneous cathode/solid electrolyte interface in an all-solid-state battery via the first-principles structure prediction scheme. Chem Mater 2020;32:85-96.

    • 29. Rauf S, Zhu B, Shah M, et al. Low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells based on Tm-doped SrCeO2-δ semiconductor electrolytes. Mater Today Energy 2021;20:100661.

    • 30. Ni J, Sun M, Li L. Highly efficient sodium storage in iron oxide nanotube arrays enabled by built-in electric field. Adv Mater 2019;31:e1902603.

    • 31. Wang F, Hu E, Wu H, et al. Surface-engineered homostructure for enhancing proton transport. Small Methods 2022;6:e2100901.

    • 32. Xing Y, Wu Y, Li L, et al. Proton shuttles in CeO2/CeO2-δ core-shell structure. ACS Energy Lett 2019;4:2601-7.

    • 33. Wang Y, Wu Y, Wang Z, Chen L, Li H, Wu F. Doping strategy and mechanism for oxide and sulfide solid electrolytes with high ionic conductivity. J Mater Chem A 2022;10:4517-32.

    • 34. Ellis BL, Lee KT, Nazar LF. Positive electrode materials for Li-ion and Li-batteries. Chem Mater 2010;22:691-714.

    • 35. Morgan D, Van der Ven A, Ceder G. Li conductivity in LixMPO4 (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) olivine materials. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 2004;7:A30.

    • 36. Gibot P, Casas-Cabanas M, Laffont L, et al. Room-temperature single-phase Li insertion/extraction in nanoscale LixFePO4. Nat Mater 2008;7:741-47.

    • 37. Zhou W, Shao Z. Fuel cells: hydrogen induced insulation. Nat Energy 2016;1:16078.

    • 38. Yoo P, Liao P. Metal-to-insulator transition in SmNiO3 induced by chemical doping: a first principles study. Mol Syst Des Eng 2018;3:264-74.

    • 39. Zhu B, Raza R, Abbas G, Singh M. An electrolyte-free fuel cell constructed from one homogenous layer with mixed conductivity. Adv Funct Mater 2011;21:2465-9.

    • 40. Shao K, Li F, Zhang G, Zhang Q, Maliutina K, Fan L. Approaching durable single-layer fuel cells: promotion of electroactivity and charge separation via nanoalloy redox exsolution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;11:27924-33.

    • 41. Fan L, Zhang H, Chen M, et al. Electrochemical study of lithiated transition metal oxide composite as symmetrical electrode for low temperature ceramic fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013;38:11398-405.

    • 42. Zhu B, Fan L, Zhao Y, Tan W, Xiong D, Wang H. Functional semiconductor-ionic composite GDC-KZnAl/LiNiCuZnOx for single-component fuel cell. RSC Adv 2014;4:9920.

    • 43. Hu H, Lin Q, Zhu Z, Zhu B, Liu X. Fabrication of electrolyte-free fuel cell with Mg0.4Zn0.6O/Ce0.8Sm0.2O2-δ-Li0.3Ni0.6Cu0.07Sr0.03O2-δ layer. J Power Sources 2014;248:577-81.

    • 44. Hu H, Lin Q, Zhu Z, Liu X, Zhu B. Time-dependent performance change of single layer fuel cell with Li0.4Mg0.3Zn0.3O/Ce0.8Sm0.2O2-δ composite. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2014;39:10718-23.

    • 45. Zhu B, Fan L, Deng H, et al. LiNiFe-based layered structure oxide and composite for advanced single layer fuel cells. J Power Sources 2016;316:37-43.

    • 46. Hu H, Lin Q, Muhammad A, Zhu B. Electrochemical study of lithiated transition metal oxide composite for single layer fuel cell. J Power Sources 2015;286:388-93.

    • 47. Ganesan P, Colon H, Haran B, White R, Popov BN. Study of cobalt-doped lithium-nickel oxides as cathodes for MCFC. J Power Sources 2002;111:109-20.

    • 48. Zhang W, Cai Y, Wang B, et al. The fuel cells studies from ionic electrolyte Ce0.8Sm0.05Ca0.15O2-δ to the mixture layers with semiconductor Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05LiO2-δ. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2016;41:18761-8.

    • 49. Yuan K, Zhu J, Dong W, et al. Applying low-pressure plasma spray (LPPS) for coatings in low-temperature SOFC. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:22243-9.

    • 50. Chen G, Sun W, Luo Y, et al. Investigation of layered Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05LiO2 in electrode for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2018;43:417-25.

    • 51. Wang K, Zheng D, Cai H, et al. Rational design of favourite lithium-ion cathode materials as electrodes for symmetrical solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram Int 2021;47:30536-45.

    • 52. Liu Y, Xia C, Wang B, Tang Y. Layered LiCoO2-LiFeO2 heterostructure composite for semiconductor-based fuel cells. Nanomaterials 2021;11:1224.

      DOIPubMed PMC
    • 53. Raza R, Gao Z, Singh T, Singh G, Li S, Zhu B. LiAlO2-LiNaCO3 composite electrolyte for solid oxide fuel cells. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2011;11:5402-7.

    • 54. Zhang W, Cai Y, Wang B, et al. Mixed ionic-electronic conductor membrane based fuel cells by incorporating semiconductor Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05LiO2-δ into the Ce0.8Sm0.2O2-δ-Na2CO3 electrolyte. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2016;41:15346-53.

    • 55. Lan R, Tao S. High ionic conductivity in a LiFeO2-LiAlO2 composite under H2/air fuel cell conditions. Chem A Eur J 2015;21:1350-8.

    • 56. Zhu J, Deng H, Zhu B, et al. Polymer-assistant ceramic nanocomposite materials for advanced fuel cell technologies. Ceram Int 2017;43:5484-9.

    • 57. Fan L, Ma Y, Wang X, Singh M, Zhu B. Understanding the electrochemical mechanism of the core-shell ceria-LiZnO nanocomposite in a low temperature solid oxide fuel cell. J Mater Chem A 2014;2:5399.

    • 58. Tu Z, Tian Y, Liu M, et al. Remarkable ionic conductivity in a LZO-SDC composite for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Nanomaterials 2021;11:2277.

      DOIPubMed PMC
    • 59. Paydar S, Peng J, Huang L, et al. Performance analysis of LiAl0.5Co0.5O2 nanosheets for intermediate-temperature fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2021;46:26478-88.

    • 60. Zhu B, Fan L, He Y, Zhao Y, Wang H. A commercial lithium battery LiMn-oxide for fuel cell applications. Mater Lett 2014;126:85-8.

    • 61. Pan C, Tan W, Lu J, Zhu B. Microstructure and catalytic activity of Li0.15Ni0.25Cu0.3Zn0.3O2-δ-Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9-carbonate nanocomposite materials functioning as single component fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2014;39:19140-7.

    • 62. Lan R, Tao S. Novel proton conductors in the layered oxide material LixlAl0.5Co0.5O2. Adv Energy Mater 2014;4:1301683.

    • 63. Gao J, Xu S, Akbar M, et al. Single layer low-temperature SOFC based on Ce0.8Sm0.2O2-δ-La0.25Sr0.75Ti1O3-δ-Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05LiO2-δ composite material. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2021;46:9775-81.

    • 64. Lu Y, Akbar M, Li J, Ma L, Wang B, Xia C. A p-n-n heterostructure composite for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J Alloys Compd 2022;890:161765.

    • 65. Tayyab Z, Rauf S, Xia C, et al. Advanced LT-SOFC based on reconstruction of the energy band structure of the LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2-Sm0.2Ce0.8O2-δ heterostructure for fast ionic transport. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2021;4:8922-32.

    • 66. Lu Y, Akbar M, Xia C, et al. Catalytic membrane with high ion-electron conduction made of strongly correlated perovskite LaNiO3 and Ce0.8Sm0.2O2-δ for fuel cells. J Catal 2020;386:117-25.

    • 67. Akbar M, Alvi F, Shakir MI, et al. Effect of sintering temperature on properties of LiNiCuZn-Oxide: a potential anode for solid oxide fuel cell. Mater Res Express 2019;6:105505.

    • 68. Zhang J, Zhang W, Xu R, Wang X, Yang X, Wu Y. Electrochemical properties and catalyst functions of natural CuFe oxide mineral-LZSDC composite electrolyte. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:22185-91.

    • 69. Ganesh KS, Wang B, Kim J, Zhu B. Ionic conducting properties and fuel cell performance developed by band structures. J Phys Chem C 2019;123:8569-77.

    • 70. Xia C, Afzal M, Wang B, et al. Mixed-conductive membrane composed of natural hematite and Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05LiO2-δ for electrolyte layer-free fuel cell. Adv Mater Lett 2017;8:114-21.

    • 71. Xia C, Qiao Z, Shen L, et al. Semiconductor electrolyte for low-operating-temperature solid oxide fuel cell: Li-doped ZnO. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2018;43:12825-34.

    • 72. Cai Y, Chen Y, Akbar M, et al. A bulk-heterostructure nanocomposite electrolyte of Ce0.8Sm0.2O2-delta-SrTiO3 for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Nanomicro Lett 2021;13:46.

      DOIPubMed PMC
    • 73. Liu X, Dong W, Xia C, et al. Study on charge transportation in the layer-structured oxide composite of SOFCs. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2018;43:12773-81.

    • 74. He Y, Chen G, Zhang X, et al. Mechanism for major improvement in SOFC electrolyte conductivity when using lithium compounds as anode. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2020;3:4134-8.

    • 75. Fan Q, Yan S, Wang H. Nanoscale redox reaction unlocking the next-generation low temperature fuel cell. Energy Mater 2022;2:200002.

    • 76. Yang D, Chen G, Liu H, et al. Electrochemical performance of a Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05LiO2 cathode for a low temperature solid oxide fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2021;46:10438-47.

    • 77. Wei L, Dong W, Yuan M, et al. Interface engineering towards low temperature in-situ densification of SOFC. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2020;45:10030-8.

    • 78. Peng X, Wang C, Liu Y, et al. Critical advances in re-engineering the cathode-electrolyte interface in alkali metal-oxygen batteries. Energy Mater 2022;1:100011.

    • 79. Bi Z, Guo X. Solidification for solid-state lithium batteries with high energy density and long cycle life. Energy Mater 2022;2:200011.

    • 80. Su H, Jiang Z, Liu Y, et al. Recent progress of sulfide electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries. Energy Mater 2022;2:200005.

    • 81. Bashir T, Ismail SA, Song Y, et al. A review of the energy storage aspects of chemical elements for lithium-ion based batteries. Energy Mater 2022;1:100019.

    • 82. Xia S, Wu X, Zhang Z, Cui Y, Liu W. Practical challenges and future perspectives of all-solid-state lithium-metal batteries. Chem 2019;5:753-85.

    • 83. Dermenci KB, Çekiç E, Turan S. Al stabilized Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes for all-solid state Li-ion batteries. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2016;41:9860-7.

    • 84. Anantharamulu N, Koteswara Rao K, Rambabu G, Vijaya Kumar B, Radha V, Vithal M. A wide-ranging review on Nasicon type materials. J Mater Sci 2011;46:2821-37.

    • 85. Yadav P, Beheshti SH, Kathribail AR, Ivanchenko P, Mierlo JV, Berecibar M. Improved performance of solid polymer electrolyte for lithium-metal batteries via hot press rolling. Polymers 2022;14:363.

      DOIPubMed PMC
    • 86. Castillo J, Qiao L, Santiago A, et al. Perspective of polymer-based solid-state Li-S batteries. Energy Mater 2022;2:200003.

    • 87. Uitz M, Epp V, Bottke P, Wilkening M. Ion dynamics in solid electrolytes for lithium batteries. J Electroceram 2017;38:142-56.

    • 88. Wang L, Światowska J, Dai S, et al. Promises and challenges of alloy-type and conversion-type anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Mater Today Energy 2019;11:46-60.

    • 89. Fleischmann S, Kamboj I, Augustyn V. Nanostructured transition metal oxides for electrochemical energy storage. In Nanda J, Augustyn V, editors, Transition Metal Oxides for Electrochemical Energy Storage. 2022. pp. 183-212.

    • 90. Williams QL, Adepoju AA, Zaab S, Doumbia M, Alqahtani Y, Adebayo V. Application of carbon nanomaterials on the performance of Li-ion batteries. In Misra P, editor, Spectroscopy and Characterization of Nanomaterials and Novel Materials. 2022. pp. 361-414.

    • 91. Chernova NA, Ma M, Xiao J, Whittingham MS, Breger J, Grey CP. Layered LixNiyMnyCo1-2yO2 cathodes for Lithium ion batteries: understanding local structure via magnetic properties. Chem Mater 2007;19:4682-93.

    • 92. Zhang X, Liu G, Zhou K, et al. Enhancing cycle life of nickel-rich LiNi0.9Co0.05Mn0.05O2 via a highly fluorinated electrolyte additive - pentafluoropyridine. Energy Mater 2021;1:100005.

    • 93. Yang Z, Zheng C, Wei Z, et al. Multi-dimensional correlation of layered Li-rich Mn-based cathode materials. Energy Mater 2022;2:200006.

    • 94. Du Z, Wood DL, Daniel C, Kalnaus S, Li J. Understanding limiting factors in thick electrode performance as applied to high energy density Li-ion batteries. J Appl Electrochem 2017;47:405-15.

    • 95. Kim H, Krishna T, Zeb K, et al. A comprehensive review of Li-ion battery materials and their recycling techniques. Electronics 2020;9:1161.

    • 96. Hautier G, Jain A, Chen H, Moore C, Ong SP, Ceder G. Novel mixed polyanions lithium-ion battery cathode materials predicted by high-throughput ab initio computations. J Mater Chem 2011;21:17147.

    • 97. Li J, Yao W, Martin S, Vaknin D. Lithium ion conductivity in single crystal LiFePO4. Solid State Ionics 2008;179:2016-9.

    • 98. Shao Y, Jin Z, Li J, Meng Y, Huang X. Evaluation of the electrochemical and expansion performances of the Sn-Si/graphite composite electrode for the industrial use. Energy Mater 2022;2:200004.

    • 99. Wang Y, Xu H, Zhong J, et al. Hierarchical Ni- and Co-based oxynitride nanoarrays with superior lithiophilicity for high-performance lithium metal anodes. Energy Mater 2022;1:100012.

    • 100. Xiao Y, Xu R, Xu L, Ding J, Huang J. Recent advances in anion-derived SEIs for fast-charging and stable lithium batteries. Energy Mater 2022;1:100013.

    • 101. Zhang L, Chen Y. Electrolyte solvation structure as a stabilization mechanism for electrodes. Energy Mater 2022;1:100004.

    • 102. Huang T, Long M, Xiao J, Liu H, Wang G. Recent research on emerging organic electrode materials for energy storage. Energy Mater 2022;1:100009.

    • 103. Li C, Zhang X, Zhu Y, et al. Modulating the lithiophilicity at electrode/electrolyte interface for high-energy Li-metal batteries. Energy Mater 2022;1:100017.

    • 104. Tarascon JM, Armand M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 2001;414:359-67.

    • 105. Thangadurai V, Kaack H, Weppner WJF. Novel fast lithium ion conduction in garnet-type Li5La3M2O12(M:Nb,Ta). ChemInform 2003;34.

    • 106. Kataoka K, Akimoto J. High ionic conductor member of garnet-type oxide Li6.5La3Zr1.5Ta0.5O12. ChemElectroChem 2018;5:2551-7.

    • 107. Jasinski G, Jasinski P, Chachulski B, Nowakowski A. Lisicon solid electrolyte electrocatalytic gas sensor. J Eur Ceram Soc 2005;25:2969-72.

    • 108. Ma Y, Teo JH, Kitsche D, et al. Cycling performance and limitations of LiNiO2 in solid-state batteries. ACS Energy Lett 2021;6:3020-8.

    • 109. Tukamoto H, West AR. Electronic conductivity of LiCoO2 and its enhancement by magnesium doping. J Electrochem Soc 1997;144:3164-8.

    • 110. Xiao P, Lv T, Chen X, Chang C. LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2: enhanced electrochemical performance from reduced cationic disordering in Li slab. Sci Rep 2017;7:1408.

    • 111. Liu Y, Liu M. Reproduction of Li battery LiNixMnyCo1-x-yO2 positive electrode material from the recycling of waste battery. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:18189-95.

    • 112. Orikasa Y, Gogyo Y, Yamashige H, et al. Ionic conduction in lithium ion battery composite electrode governs cross-sectional reaction distribution. Sci Rep 2016;6:26382.

      DOIPubMed PMC
    • 113. Choi D, Wang D, Bae IT, et al. LiMnPO4 nanoplate grown via solid-state reaction in molten hydrocarbon for Li-ion battery cathode. Nano Lett 2010;10:2799-805.

    • 114. Rao B, Padmaraj O, Narsimulu D, Venkateswarlu M, Satyanarayana N. A.C conductivity and dielectric properties of spinel LiMn2O4 nanorods. Ceram Int 2015;41:14070-7.

    • 115. Shah MY, Lu Y, Mushtaq N, et al. ZnO/MgZnO heterostructure membrane with type II band alignment for ceramic fuel cells. Energy Mater 2022;2:200031.

    • 116. Chen G, Liu H, He Y, et al. Electrochemical mechanisms of an advanced low-temperature fuel cell with a SrTiO3 electrolyte. J Mater Chem A 2019;7:9638-45.


    Cite This Article

    OAE Style

    Zhou X, Yang J, Wang R, Zhang W, Yun S, Wang B. Advances in lithium-ion battery materials for ceramic fuel cells. Energy Mater 2022;2:200041.

    AMA Style

    Zhou X, Yang J, Wang R, Zhang W, Yun S, Wang B. Advances in lithium-ion battery materials for ceramic fuel cells. Energy Materials. 2022; 2(6):200041.

    Chicago/Turabian Style

    Zhou, Xiaomi, Jingjing Yang, Ruoming Wang, Wei Zhang, Sining Yun, Baoyuan Wang. 2022. "Advances in lithium-ion battery materials for ceramic fuel cells" Energy Materials. 2, no.6: 200041.

    ACS Style

    Zhou, X.; Yang J.; Wang R.; Zhang W.; Yun S.; Wang B. Advances in lithium-ion battery materials for ceramic fuel cells. Energy Mater. 20222, 200041.




    Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at

    © 2016-2023 OAE Publishing Inc., except certain content provided by third parties